The Comparative Study of Pictorial Elements in Ahmed Musa Mirajnameh and Mir Heidar Mirajnameh

Document Type: Research Article

Authors

1 Art, adyan mazaheb,Iran

2 faculty member of Mazandaran University,Iran

Abstract

 
The Ascension (Mi’raj) of the prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is one of the important subjects considered by Iranian poets and authors during the different Islamic periods. Two prominent works in two art periods of Iranian art history were Ahmed Musa Mirajnameh illustrate din Tabriz in the Ilkhanid era and Mir Heidar Mirajnameh that was illustrated in the first period of Herat school in the Timurid era. In this study, the main pictorial elements of ascension (Mi’raj) were described and analyzed. Then, seven images left from Ahmed Musa Mirajnameh, based on its main elements, were compared to seven images of Mir Heidar Mirajnameh. The research hypotheses included the combination of Chinese and Iranian arts and the influence of each Mirajnameh from the art of its period. The present study aimed at investigating the main elements of ascension (Mi’raj) including the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) image, Gabriel, Buraq, angels, and the skies as well as studying and comparing them based on the main elements in the two above-mentioned Mirajnamehs. The research method was descriptive, analytical-comparative and the data collection method was library. Two main results were achieved through this study. One of the results was that the main elements, similarities, and differences between the compared images in Ahmed Musa Mirajnameh were different from Mir Heidar Mirajnameh and the other results was that the text used in Ahmed Musa Mirajnameh was different from the illustrated text in Mir Heidar Mirajnameh. Since the used text in Mir Heidar Mirajnameh is not clear, this result cannot be useful in other studies.
 

Keywords


 

  1. Balkhari, Hassan. 2005. The basics of mysticism and Islamic Art and Architecture. Surah Mehr
  2. Tehran, Reza. 2010, Comparative Study of Structural Elements in Ahmed Musa and Mir Heidar Mirajnamehs, Negareh: 14: 22-37.
  3. Razi, Hashem. 2000. Khosravani's wisdom. Behjat publication.
  4. Rosegae, Marie. 2006.  The miraculous journey of the Prophet (pbuh), translated by Mahnaz Shayestehfar. Studies of Islamic art.
  5. Shine Dashtgel, Helena .2010. Writing the Mi’raj from manuscripts to popular paintings by looking at the iconography of the Prophet Mohammad (pbuh). Scientific and Cultural Company.
  6. Shin Dashtgel, Helena, 2005. The image of the Prophet of Islam in the ritualistic process. Shargh newspaper, February 19
  7. Sharatou A, and Gerube A, 1997. Ilkhanid and Timurid art, translated by Yaqob Azhand. Molly
  8. Shams Boroujeni, Massoud. 2014. The evolution of the Qur'anic angelography in the painting of Islamic Iran from the 7th century AH to the end of the 11th century AH with regard to the hadiths of Quranic verses and Islamic philosophy. Master's Thesis, Faculty of Arts and Islamic Azad University.
  9. Afifi, Rahim, 1964. Book of Arda Viraf, Mashhad Ferdowsi University.
  10. Farid, Amir .2009. Color in colorless. Ketabe Mahe Honar 136: 58-63.
  11. Gharib, Yahya. 1978. Tuhfat al-Iraqayn by Khaqani Sharwani, Tehran: Pocket Books
  12. Corbin, Henry, 2005. Zoroastrianism in the thoughts of Suhrawardi, translated by Behforudi, Jami
  13. Gharasashi Fakhr, Mohammad Reza. 2010. A look at the symbol of Buraq in the schools of Herat and Tabriz. Role 5: 43-52.
  14. Mohammadi Shahroudi, Abdolali. 2000. Ascension in the mirror of reasoning. Oswah
  15. Maleki, Toka. 2008. Iranian Painting Angels. Ketabe Mahe Honar 120: 86-92.
  16. Rumi, Jalal al-Din Muhammad ibn Muhammad. 2007. Diwan-e Shams-e Tabrizi, Based on the publication of Badi'-Zaman Foruzanfar. Tehran: Hermes.
  17. Nikoo Nejad, Mahboobeh. 1392. Multiplicity of the meaning of fire in Timurid Mirajnameh, Jelveh Mahe Honar, 10: 45-60.